<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>AllFacebook - Latest Comments in Conflicting Numbers Over Facebook Redesign Arises</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://allfacebook.disqus.com/conflicting_numbers_over_facebook_redesign_arises/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:34:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Conflicting Numbers Over Facebook Redesign Arises</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/conflicting-numbers-over-facebook-redesign-arises/304741#comment-2109387</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's no numerical conflict here.  The total number of users (100 million +) and the number of users visiting Facebook since the new design went live are two different numbers.  We can estimate 50 million have actively visited from the 30 million/60% they offer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:34:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Conflicting Numbers Over Facebook Redesign Arises</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/conflicting-numbers-over-facebook-redesign-arises/304741#comment-2101689</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the new Facobook design, but still runs the old one due to bugs in the new one. So that is another category of users.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stig</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:46:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>