<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>AllFacebook - Latest Comments in Facebook&amp;#8217;s Reliability Issues</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://allfacebook.disqus.com/facebook8217s_reliability_issues/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 03:00:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Facebook&amp;#8217;s Reliability Issues</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebooks-reliability-issues/303565#comment-1637323</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am always conscious of the fact that a site could be down. It is a matter of spreading one's risk. Regardless of the service whether it is Google Docs and Spreadsheets, Zoho Office, or Facebook -- always spread the risk.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Elwyn Jenkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 03:00:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook&amp;#8217;s Reliability Issues</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebooks-reliability-issues/303565#comment-1637324</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let's put it this way... all sites should be up 99% of the time if they want to be used. Any less than that and people will just avoid the site or start looking around for alternatives I think.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kyle Mulka</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 16:13:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>