<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>AllFacebook - Latest Comments in Facebook Application Sale Disappoints</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://allfacebook.disqus.com/facebook_application_sale_disappoints/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:43:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Facebook Application Sale Disappoints</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-application-sale-disappoints/303993#comment-1638676</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's not the economy, it's the profit and ROI that important..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marcel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:43:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Application Sale Disappoints</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-application-sale-disappoints/303993#comment-1638675</link><description>&lt;p&gt;and why stop with apps, I'd love to unload my Fan Page (141 "fans" and growing) on some sucker(whoops, I mean 'investor').&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:21:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Application Sale Disappoints</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-application-sale-disappoints/303993#comment-1638674</link><description>&lt;p&gt;let's not forget the bogus auction of the "I am Hungry" app, for $20K.&lt;br&gt;(except that Nick still believes it to be legit!).&lt;br&gt;Someone bought that POS for $20K and what, go look, they have done nothing, in months, to it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:16:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Application Sale Disappoints</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-application-sale-disappoints/303993#comment-1638673</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Eventually someone will pay serious money for an application, creators merely need to focus on business model rather than on the number of active users.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As other social networks increasingly incorporate user applications, investors will be looking for applications that have established a foothold in numerous networks. Focussing purely on Facebook would be a bad investment&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David S</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:30:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Application Sale Disappoints</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-application-sale-disappoints/303993#comment-1638678</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All they did is create an image and say it was "limited edition".   If anything the lack of winning bid is a sign that Web 2.0 and Facebook apps are not a bubble, and that people actually care about ROI.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:29:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Application Sale Disappoints</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-application-sale-disappoints/303993#comment-1638672</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The buyers of Where I've Been denied that it was purchased for $3m. It was just an unfounded blog rumour.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:59:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Application Sale Disappoints</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-application-sale-disappoints/303993#comment-1638677</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't forget about "Where I've Been"... $3 million (!!)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg Tracy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:09:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>