<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>AllFacebook - Latest Comments in Facebook Apps Are the Ads</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://allfacebook.disqus.com/facebook_apps_are_the_ads/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:12:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Facebook Apps Are the Ads</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-apps-are-the-ads/304407#comment-1640108</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed. The CPM approach is dead (or at least dying). If I had a penny for how many calls I get from vendors wanting my company to advertise on/in their apps, I'd be living off the coast of France.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Smart brands know to apply the funds to custom applications that drive *real* brand value, fosters engagement, and builds deeper relationships.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Damon Henry</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:12:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Apps Are the Ads</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-apps-are-the-ads/304407#comment-1640106</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Slide's CPM's are over $3 and Scrabulous would not take anything under $9..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder how much Flixster is.. at this point, I think quality over quantity will matter. Apps who have better demographic have the ability to ask more money to advertisers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sav</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:39:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>