<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>AllFacebook - Latest Comments in Facebook Creates A Revolution in Relationships</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://allfacebook.disqus.com/facebook_creates_a_revolution_in_relationships/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 08:53:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Facebook Creates A Revolution in Relationships</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/social-networking-brings-a-revolution-in-relationships/303457#comment-1637135</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are referring to Dunbar's number. Actually its a maximum of 147,8 personal connections.&lt;br&gt;I wrote a thesis (first of its kinf in french) "Facebook, Myspace, online social network services and new communication behaviors" and quoted this extract from Dunbar's "Co-Evolution Of Neocortex Size, Group Size And Language In Humans" :&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"the suggestion here is simply that there is an upper limit on the size of groups that can be maintained by direct personal contact.&lt;br&gt;The second point is that the limit imposed by neocortical processing capacity is simply on the number of individuals with whom a stable inter-personal relationship can be maintained. This in no sense commits us to any particular way of structuring those groups"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dunbar explained the emergence of larger groups (Nation-States for ex) by the use of the language as a social bonding mechanism. Still, many "primitive" groups are no larger than 150.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My thesis conclusion was that the SocNets are freeing the humans from their physiological restraints to communication. And yeah, that stalking cute girls on facebook is fun too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thibaut</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 08:53:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>