<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>AllFacebook - Latest Comments in Facebook Is Getting Into Porn?</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://allfacebook.disqus.com/facebook_is_getting_into_porn/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:10:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Getting Into Porn?</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-is-getting-into-porn/304206#comment-1639381</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Guys,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seriously, this is a great thing. Why are you so surprised and shocked? &lt;br&gt;having 18/21 tags is great for industries that want to advertise on social media sites like Facebook, but cannot because of the age targeting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Go Facebook!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Golan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:10:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Getting Into Porn?</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-is-getting-into-porn/304206#comment-1639383</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cmon buddy, obviously they werent getting into porn and you of all people shouldve been able to decipher that it was either for advertisers or it's new payment system...exactly what I thought when reading your post.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dont walk the same blog path as Perez Hilton.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also posted on Facebooks payment system and social payments in general on my site today.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:47:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Getting Into Porn?</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-is-getting-into-porn/304206#comment-1639382</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't forget about the fb:65-plus tag that will be used to advertise the hottest places to play bingo.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Auer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:17:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Getting Into Porn?</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-is-getting-into-porn/304206#comment-1639380</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would bet anxious advertisers had requested those changes.  While it's not very well known, numerous industries [outside of the vices you mention] adhere to strict age limitations on messaging to minors.  Think pharma, food service, political interests...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When advertisers know for certain that their content will only display to 18+ or 21+ profiles, they won't need to jump through as many legal hoops or fine print when presenting the messages.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickhuhn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:02:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Getting Into Porn?</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-is-getting-into-porn/304206#comment-1639384</link><description>&lt;p&gt;they can share people's pictures though, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan Kleiman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:03:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Getting Into Porn?</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-is-getting-into-porn/304206#comment-1639379</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well this has to do with limiting content that's displayed.  Applications are not allowed in any way to share personally identifiable information obtained from any application as it is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:58:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Getting Into Porn?</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-is-getting-into-porn/304206#comment-1639378</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Couldn't this be related to the sharing of information of people under 18, or 21 in countries that so opt?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan Kleiman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:42:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>