DISQUS

Christopher G · 1 year ago

Whatever. Facebook moves me about as much as the Microsoft.com homepage. Facebook *is* the Microsoft of social web - a bloated, domineering, kitchen-sink fail. And FriendFeed is Google - fast, lean, perfect.

khylek · 1 year ago

Someone needs to make an AIR app out of this. Then it would be fairly interesting.

Christian Cadeo · 1 year ago

Beside an AIR, perhaps a widget or at the very least make an optimized version that you can have on your FF sidebar.

Gabriel · 1 year ago

The functionallity is fine but its no Twitter killer for the simple reason that Twitter is much better than anything else on mobile phones.

Daryl · 1 year ago

Nice - hadn't noticed this. Thanks for sharing Nick.

Joe Dawson · 1 year ago

I must admit I am well impressed with how Facebook merged the Wall and Mini-Feed, they took this a step further with the Homepage and the headed feeds. I agree with khylek I would like to have an Adobe AIR application running with the steady stream of updates but that's unlikely to happen unless Facebook realise the potential and make it possible!

Scott · 1 year ago

I do like the new feature, but I would love to see a feed of new group posts. I rarely click all my groups to keep up on the new posts.

netik · 1 year ago

I guess in a way the video demonstrates why Twitter is still more fun. The update rate is extremely slow and that's not software related; it's simply because people are not as chatty on Facebook as they are on a dedicated service like Twitter.

If an app or API comes out and is regularly used, we might see more use (Adium now supports Facebook chat, for example), but what I get now out of Adium's facebook chat are the same 20-30 status messages over and over again.

Then again, I'm biased. I work there.

Nick O'Neill · 1 year ago

It's funny that you say that ... a few minutes after this, news feed items were flying by. Can you really pay attention to a million news stories moving by rapid fire? While it looks cool, it doesn't seem very useful. It's the same problem with following thousands of people on Twitter ... it just doesn't work

memo · 1 year ago

Nick, a few serious questions... and imo, worth legitimate exploration (preferably by you, since you understand both sides of the fence so well)...

How much longer are Fred W. and Paul B. going to play possum while fb slowly but steadily assimilates the very best their respective startups have to offer??
I

Christopher G · 1 year ago

Let FB keep assimilating. They can keep doing so until their site runs as well as Vista - it's getting there already.

baratunde · 1 year ago

hey i can't see the "reply" links on your disqus comments. it's in white font for me. FFox mac. fwiw

this is a very cool feature. agree with commenter below that integrating Group (AND PAGE) activity into the feed is important. in fact it's more important to me that the live option. Items that have no feed presence die. It's that simple. There's no periodic reminder that groups exist, other than getting a mass message from the group owner. Same with Pages. Facebook is leaving a LOT of interaction on the table by failing to integrate these two community assets into the feed structure.

also, they should let me file my email in folders/tags.

Krystalo · 1 year ago

You should read this: http://www.neowin.net/news/main/08/08/30/how-fa...

Jesse Stay · 1 year ago

It's not though because of one thing - it's not open. I can't read my feed or comment on my feed outside of Facebook. On Twitter and FriendFeed I can. Provide me RSS and an API to access this feed and you'll compete with Twitter and Friendfeed, and be a pretty good competitor even.

Daniel Mettler · 1 year ago

Nick, whether FB Live Feed could potentially be a Twitter killer depends on your definition of the market. If you're talking about the mass-market you might be right, as FB has quite an advantage in regard to the number of users already. However, it's not always about quantity, but also about quality. And that's exactly why I, as long as I can, will only use Twitter, and not FB's Live Feed.

One big challenge human beings will face in the near future is how to deal with huge amounts of information. We'll need to be able to better distinguish between subjectively relevant and irrelevant information in order to deal with the increasing amount of information hitting us everywhere and every time.

Considering this, I actually HOPE that Twitter will not go mainstream anytime soon. Let FB be the community that cares about shoes that peers just bought, about private relationships that seemingly ended 1 minute ago and that will be re-established 2 hrs later again, about embarrassing new photos of the crash at the latest private party, about "drinking coffee now" status updates and hourly news from tons of friends that aren't really that close friends at all.

Currently, I'm simply not interested enough in getting all these little short-lived information bites about mostly PRIVATE stuff, i.e. trivia. And I doubt I will be interested in this anytime soon.

That's where the advantage of Twitter comes into play: So far, it's a one-to-one and one-to-many messaging platform that is particularly popular among IT professionals, new media and marketing people and other early movers. And as such, it's mostly used for exchanging and broadcasting IT related or otherwise "professionally relevant" information with a longer half-life and higher relevance to me as an IT pro myself.

I thus wish FB a lot of success in the mainstream market and hope that Twitter will keep focusing on its niche.

Mark · 1 year ago

Digg had this quite some time ago.

omouse · 1 year ago

Barely anyone uses the comments. Maybe for a few comments and that's it. With FriendFeed there are tons and tons of comments posted, it feels like people are actually having a conversation. On Facebook, that only happens with the Wall and that is still a one-to-one convo.

yasir · 1 year ago

video no workie

Roger Xiao · 1 year ago

RIP FriendFeed

Never got to and never will be mainstream.