<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>AllFacebook - Latest Comments in Facebook Newsfeed, Not the Primary Source of App Installs</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 01:36:53 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Facebook Newsfeed, Not the Primary Source of App Installs</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/10/facebook-newsfeed-not-the-primary-source-of-app-installs/#comment-1638208</link><description>I’d love to see a comparative study to see if apps that have matching appname and URL (on &lt;a href="http://apps.facebook.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;apps.facebook.com&lt;/a&gt;) have higher install rates than other apps.&lt;br&gt;And to push that one step further… Has an economy formed around “domaining” for FB app names?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;yee,&lt;br&gt;    Thanks for posting that, I'm interested in learning more about naming apps, if you see anything, please let me know...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 01:36:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Newsfeed, Not the Primary Source of App Installs</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/10/facebook-newsfeed-not-the-primary-source-of-app-installs/#comment-1638207</link><description>Just found similar results for my app (Smarter Than My Friends).  Profile Add boxes and Product Directory drove 80%+ of installs.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Given that the Directory is such a key driver of current app installs, I'd love to see a comparative study to see if apps that have matching appname and URL (on &lt;a href="http://apps.facebook.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;apps.facebook.com&lt;/a&gt;) have higher install rates than other apps.  This would run totally counter to some of the "conventional wisdom" I've heard (e.g., "Your app name and URL doesn't matter" -- if the Directory is important, then it could be ALL about naming.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And to push that one step further...  Has an economy formed around "domaining" for FB app names?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">yee</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:09:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Newsfeed, Not the Primary Source of App Installs</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/10/facebook-newsfeed-not-the-primary-source-of-app-installs/#comment-1638206</link><description>agree with craig above; News Feed doesn't matter as much right now for new user adoption since app messages aren't visible to non-app users (except for the one-liner about "user X installed app Y).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;that may change if/when FB re-enables app messaging for non-app users.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;still, i agree that profile box visibility is a big driver for  adoption.  probably moreso for apps like Fluff Friends that use profile box real estate for app info updates than other less-interesting ones, but regardless it's probably a high priority acquisition channel for most apps.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;it is surprising that app directory is a significant channel... wonder whether that means we're seeing over-representation of the geek audience as new app adopters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- dmc</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davemc500hats</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:05:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Newsfeed, Not the Primary Source of App Installs</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/10/facebook-newsfeed-not-the-primary-source-of-app-installs/#comment-1638205</link><description>You should probably point out that NFO does not come into application installs since news feed items only show to users who have the app installed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The news feed stats purely refer to the "x has added the y application".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Craig Bovis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:22:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>