<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>AllFacebook - Latest Comments in Facebook Removing &amp;#8220;Is&amp;#8221; From Status Updates?</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://allfacebook.disqus.com/facebook_removing_8220is8221_from_status_updates/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:15:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Facebook Removing &amp;#8220;Is&amp;#8221; From Status Updates?</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-removing-is-from-status-updates/303975#comment-1638600</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I miss the "is..." It was fun trying to come up with sentences to fit it. I was almost starting to begin all my sentences with is...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:15:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Removing &amp;#8220;Is&amp;#8221; From Status Updates?</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-removing-is-from-status-updates/303975#comment-1638601</link><description>&lt;p&gt;oh comon man why remove the "is" thats terrible!!! let it be! lets have some grammatical error fun Facbook should not bend before grammatical rules! i am highly against it! Live n let live! thats what we need!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fati.m.a</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:08:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Removing &amp;#8220;Is&amp;#8221; From Status Updates?</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-removing-is-from-status-updates/303975#comment-1638610</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My is is stuck.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JustMo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:25:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Removing &amp;#8220;Is&amp;#8221; From Status Updates?</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-removing-is-from-status-updates/303975#comment-1638602</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"It depends on what the meaning of the words 'is' is." –Bill Clinton, during his 1998 grand jury testimony on the Monica Lewinsky affair&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kevlar</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:22:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Removing &amp;#8220;Is&amp;#8221; From Status Updates?</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-removing-is-from-status-updates/303975#comment-1638608</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lol, making "is" a throwback.  That's great!  We should get together 10 years from now and say "Remember when 'is' was in the status updates on facebook?"  Those were the good days!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:03:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Removing &amp;#8220;Is&amp;#8221; From Status Updates?</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-removing-is-from-status-updates/303975#comment-1638603</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Haha, I kind of liked the quirky, non-grammatical things people came up with for status updates. A worthy change, though. I can still choose to add a nonsensical "is" on top of whatever I write, as a throwback.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mary Specht</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:06:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Removing &amp;#8220;Is&amp;#8221; From Status Updates?</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-removing-is-from-status-updates/303975#comment-1638604</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why does it need to be a verb?   It should be completely freeform.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jamie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:24:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Removing &amp;#8220;Is&amp;#8221; From Status Updates?</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-removing-is-from-status-updates/303975#comment-1638607</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's true ... I kind of enjoyed that as well.  I like that it's better integrated with Twitter though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:13:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Removing &amp;#8220;Is&amp;#8221; From Status Updates?</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-removing-is-from-status-updates/303975#comment-1638606</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that's too bad.  I always have fun trying to bend what I want say around the is - the more creative I have to be, the better. Just one more thing that dilutes the uniqueness of FB.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Colin Carmichael</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:42:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>