<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>AllFacebook - Latest Comments in Facebook Updates Their Galleries</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://allfacebook.disqus.com/facebook_updates_their_galleries/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:44:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Facebook Updates Their Galleries</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-updates-their-galleries/304039#comment-1638819</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I clearly remember a discussion with my mom back in the 90's about the potential of javascript preloading scripts. I thought at the time that she was crazy, but apparently she was right on! The poof is in the prudding when it comes to smooth graphic interfaces. And no... it really isn't straight AJAX, but who cares?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">William O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:44:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Updates Their Galleries</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-updates-their-galleries/304039#comment-1638818</link><description>&lt;p&gt;now if only they'll add that option to let you choose only specific individual/contact(s) to view your photo albums. the "only friends" option is not sufficient. facebook really needs to learn from &lt;a href="http://www.multiply.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.multiply.com"&gt;multiply&lt;/a&gt; in the photos department.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">facebooker</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:12:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Updates Their Galleries</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-updates-their-galleries/304039#comment-1638817</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Finally. Smoothness is definitely a plus.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tan The Man</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 03:19:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Updates Their Galleries</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-updates-their-galleries/304039#comment-1638814</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great point Dan.  Thanks for pointing out that it isn't completely AJAX.  It is instead a javascript preloading script.  Regardless, it makes things a lot smoother!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 01:09:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Updates Their Galleries</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-updates-their-galleries/304039#comment-1638816</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, this is awesome, I wrote in about it and wasn't sure if I was crazy or not. iPhone users have enjoyed this for sometime now and it's nice to see it finally make it to the full site.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Kessler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 22:45:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Updates Their Galleries</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-updates-their-galleries/304039#comment-1638815</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think I would really count that as AJAX.&lt;br&gt;To be considered as proper AJAX, it has to use the XMLHttpRequest (or&lt;br&gt;the IE equivalent). However, what Facebook has done is put all the&lt;br&gt;data for the entire photo album on the page when you load it. Open up&lt;br&gt;an image, and look at the pages, source. Near the bottom of the page,&lt;br&gt;you'll see inside a  tag, something like this:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;onloadRegister(function() {new Photostream($("myphoto"),&lt;br&gt;"http:\/\/&lt;a href="http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="photos-d.ak.facebook.com"&gt;photos-d.ak.facebook.com&lt;/a&gt;\/photos-ak-sf2p ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is probably what I would have done as well. I think it's great.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Jones</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 17:33:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>