<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>AllFacebook - Latest Comments in Facebook Worth $9 Billion?</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:57:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Facebook Worth $9 Billion?</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/04/facebook-worth-9-billion/#comment-1640117</link><description>No doubt Blodgett was discredited during the .com implosion. But it's always interesting to read any contribution to 2.0 valuation theory.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nick, you must be inspired by the valuation for Huffington Post.  You too can be a millionaire blogger!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just an FYI: SAI values Twitter (a "contender") at $75 million. It's easily confused as the real-time valuation figures are in thousands.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David R. Strachan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:57:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Worth $9 Billion?</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/04/facebook-worth-9-billion/#comment-1640114</link><description>I have decided to make it my personal mission to ban all commentary on anything Henry Blodget predicts.  Seriously, not only is he never in the ballpark, but he doesn't even get in the same universe as reality. He is a linkbaiter and rumor mongerer and that is about all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;$2,000 Google stocks? Remember those?  Yeah, neither do I.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">acafourek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:17:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>