<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>AllFacebook - Latest Comments in Robert Scoble&amp;#8217;s $45 Billion Website</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 15:55:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Robert Scoble&amp;#8217;s $45 Billion Website</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/05/robert-scobles-45-billion-website/#comment-1640321</link><description>@John, I saw your news article and appreciate you posting it.  I'm not crediting Scoble for breaking the news, I was simply commenting on Robert's take on it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He said "we will never get an open Web back if these two deals happen."  I had to post something about a ridiculous statement like that.  Sorry about that!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 15:55:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Scoble&amp;#8217;s $45 Billion Website</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/05/robert-scobles-45-billion-website/#comment-1640323</link><description>Breaking News! Scoble discovers yet more crackpot 'news' up his arse.&lt;br&gt;Quite why anyone listens to this individual is a mystery to me. Maybe if we ignore Scoble, he will go away.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:36:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Scoble&amp;#8217;s $45 Billion Website</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/05/robert-scobles-45-billion-website/#comment-1640322</link><description>Nick:  Great post.  For 4 a.m., I think Robert made some very compelling points that, at a minimum, will foster some heated debate today.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree with you on merit though.  A MSFT acquisition at that valuation I find ludicrous.  But I also don't find it has scary regarding the "world domination effect" for the very reason you point out.  Why would we go back to the AOL walled-garden is precisely something I was thinking.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We've spent that last 10 years opening.  I don't think the value proposition of Facebook is compelling enough for users to stay behind the wall.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lou Paglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 13:37:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Scoble&amp;#8217;s $45 Billion Website</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/05/robert-scobles-45-billion-website/#comment-1640320</link><description>Why does Robert thing that Microsoft will buy Facebook? &lt;br&gt;engrish</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill Gates</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 11:36:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Scoble&amp;#8217;s $45 Billion Website</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/05/robert-scobles-45-billion-website/#comment-1640330</link><description>Nick:  source of the story is here.  Robert and Kara both credited the original source. Over the past three months I've posted at least 4 exclusive scoops that all have developed into big stories.  It's interesting to see who credits it.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://furrier.org/2008/05/19/silicon-valley-rumor-microsoft-to-buy-yahoo-search-and-then-facebook/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://furrier.org/2008/05/19/silicon-valley-ru...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Furrier</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 10:49:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Scoble&amp;#8217;s $45 Billion Website</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/05/robert-scobles-45-billion-website/#comment-1640329</link><description>Scoble seems to have a knack for this sort of thing becoming 75% true.  I don't know if I can see Zuck selling still, but after how the news cycle has pounded on Facebook in the last six months, he may very well want to bounce Facebook off.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If Facebook sells, I expect another social network, or more likely a new one, to gain momentum, even in this crowded space.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Its just a matter of time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Parr</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 10:37:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Scoble&amp;#8217;s $45 Billion Website</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/05/robert-scobles-45-billion-website/#comment-1640328</link><description>well, now that you mention it, Facebook's search does leave something to be desired...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 10:34:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Scoble&amp;#8217;s $45 Billion Website</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/05/robert-scobles-45-billion-website/#comment-1640327</link><description>he also has another one..someone offered a bet on one of Scoble's fb assumptions.. if Scoble looses he ha sot lip synch and Video tape it..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Scoble seems to be ducking and hiding form that bet..I wonder  why?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fred Grott</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 10:33:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Scoble&amp;#8217;s $45 Billion Website</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/05/robert-scobles-45-billion-website/#comment-1640326</link><description>Billions people, not millions.... all this talk is daft as..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 10:33:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Scoble&amp;#8217;s $45 Billion Website</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/05/robert-scobles-45-billion-website/#comment-1640325</link><description>That's a great excuse that I'm going to use on the Gillmor Gang today if Arrington comes after me. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 10:26:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>