Well if it violates Facebook terms of service, there's no reason he should be allowed something anybody else can't do.
Charlie
· 1 year ago
I think a facebook application should be allowed to import any and all of a user's contact information into its own database for permanent storage...
PROVIDED THAT THE USER THE INFORMATION BELONGS TO EXPLICITLY ALLOWS THE APPLICATION TO MAKE A COPY OF HIS/HER DATA
The information is the property of the users. Facebook is simply keeping that information with its users' implicit trust that it won't abuse the privilege. Facebook should not release this information to anyone without the users' consent.
Similarly, if users want an application such as Plaxo to have their personal information, it is not Facebook's place to stand in the way and force the user to reenter it.
I think the options presented to the user when s/he adds an application (and later in the application preferences) should give users the opportunity to make clear what they prefer to share with applications and whether they consent to having the applications store that information long-term. The default settings should be chosen to protect the user, but the user should have the final say.
shashi bellamkonda
· 1 year ago
I think Facebook should come out with a statement soon. The issue is here is that there was no warning given ( is that true?) Facebook should warn people first before disabling their account.I think they should restore his access for after all he is a hon guy and so are mnay tohers who may have used the app/script. I am sure they don't plan to use it now that they are painfully aware that it is against the TOS. Second aren't all Facebook apps vetted by Facebook?
Nick O'Neill
· 1 year ago
@Shashi, I actually disagree with you. Let's say a hacker compromised someone's account and started crawling the site. That account needs to be at least temporarily banned to prevent ongoing hacking.
In regards to your second question, this wasn't a Facebook application. It was a generic script that was automatically logging into Facebook as a user and crawling their friends.
Charlie
· 1 year ago
Ah, well yeah, a script shouldn't be allowed to just crawl the site like that.
But I am sticking with what I said about facebook applications and users' data. I'm hoping people will back me up on this and get facebook to make this change.
It's the difference between a walled garden and an open web. It would essentially solve the multiple login problem and establish facebook, and other similar platforms, as providers of an online identity that other sites can tie into.
Ollie
· 1 year ago
Nick could you write a post on accounts being banned, talking about the main reasons this happens and what actions people can take to restore them? It's something I'd find interesting and I'm sure you know more than most about this.
Charlie
· 1 year ago
I feel oddly satisfied in regards to my earlier comment on this thread. Now that facebook and google have joined DataPortability.org, I feel like they listened to me, just five days after I wrote that.
All Comments
PROVIDED THAT THE USER THE INFORMATION BELONGS TO EXPLICITLY ALLOWS THE APPLICATION TO MAKE A COPY OF HIS/HER DATA
The information is the property of the users. Facebook is simply keeping that information with its users' implicit trust that it won't abuse the privilege. Facebook should not release this information to anyone without the users' consent.
Similarly, if users want an application such as Plaxo to have their personal information, it is not Facebook's place to stand in the way and force the user to reenter it.
I think the options presented to the user when s/he adds an application (and later in the application preferences) should give users the opportunity to make clear what they prefer to share with applications and whether they consent to having the applications store that information long-term. The default settings should be chosen to protect the user, but the user should have the final say.
Second aren't all Facebook apps vetted by Facebook?
In regards to your second question, this wasn't a Facebook application. It was a generic script that was automatically logging into Facebook as a user and crawling their friends.
But I am sticking with what I said about facebook applications and users' data. I'm hoping people will back me up on this and get facebook to make this change.
It's the difference between a walled garden and an open web. It would essentially solve the multiple login problem and establish facebook, and other similar platforms, as providers of an online identity that other sites can tie into.