-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Hi Nick, I've been a fan of the All Facebook blog for a few months, but I'm sad to say I'll be removing it from my feed reader. I feel that leading this story with poor attempts at...
- Social Media is going under!
- Scott, I've now seen your full presentation on the Lookery blog. I think the crucial thing you're missing is possibly also absent from Nick's original post about the decline of his Bush...
- Funny - I've been kinda thinking about the opposite - doing more Facebook status and less Twitter.
- Thats shocking
DISQUS
Returning? Login
7 months ago
7 months ago
7 months ago
7 months ago
7 months ago
7 months ago
5/5 correct!
7 months ago
7 months ago
7 months ago
I never really noticed it myself, but once I checked it out I saw that 4/5 were correct.
I also thought for a second that it would have been pretty cool if these were the girls most often viewing my profile.
I can dream...
7 months ago
7 months ago
7 months ago
7 months ago
7 months ago
Find a Group with only one member (probably the creator) but whose profile you do not have access to.
The Related Groups box will show you a selection of their groups, which you're not supposed to know!
Not the worst privacy breach, although that depends which groups you've joined...
7 months ago
7 months ago
7 months ago
7 months ago
I've noticed this feature this past week as well. It was meanwhile cancelled, due to your interference...
It was just introduced last week. My thesis is that it was part of a new search tool, which shows the people you have searched for the most. (Meaning if you went to their pages through links they will not be included here).
This change came with another change (which now disappeared together with this feature) - when you search for friends and type their name, the ones you typed most often in the past came up first, as opposed to alphabetically.