<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>AllFacebook - Latest Comments in Update: ConnectU Inc. v. Facebook Inc.</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:11:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Update: ConnectU Inc. v. Facebook Inc.</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/update-connectu-inc-v-facebook-inc/#comment-1639475</link><description>I'm not sure ConnectU wants to wave their arms about Facebook stealing an abysmal search feature from them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dbrowell</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:11:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Update: ConnectU Inc. v. Facebook Inc.</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/update-connectu-inc-v-facebook-inc/#comment-1639477</link><description>By the way.. it looks like ConnectU's own witness testified that she did not send any of Zuckerberg's code to the copyright office for ConnectU because: "...it's not our code."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan Kleiman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:04:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Update: ConnectU Inc. v. Facebook Inc.</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/update-connectu-inc-v-facebook-inc/#comment-1639476</link><description>Wow, if that's the best they can do then this is a joke. That looks like a basic use case outline for every web form driven search routine ever written. And the rest is worse for them of course. Stupid jocks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:52:38 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>