<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>AllFacebook - Latest Comments in Valleywag Gets it Wrong</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 06:50:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Valleywag Gets it Wrong</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-1638812</link><description>Well then it's quite unfortunate :-|</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">113.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 06:50:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Valleywag Gets it Wrong</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-1638811</link><description>113 - if the boss were managing a social enterprise, then yes. That's not the case here though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ollie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 01:09:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Valleywag Gets it Wrong</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-1638807</link><description>Thanks Dan...I have AllFacebook in my feed reader, but I wasn't sure which article referenced ValleyWag</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Huggins</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 19:51:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Valleywag Gets it Wrong</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-1638810</link><description>True or otherwise, the act is purely reasonable, acceptable, and expected.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boss is boss. Staff is staff. What the staff might be thinking? Do you think the boss (any boss) would &lt;b&gt;really&lt;/b&gt; care?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">113.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 07:22:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Valleywag Gets it Wrong</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-1638806</link><description>Matt, if you haven't been following every single word Nick has written - unlikely, I know - he was referring to his previous article:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/zuckerberg-sells-40-million-of-stock/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/zuckerberg-s...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seemed perfectly believable, but did leave us wondering what the rest of the Facebook staff might be thinking...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Lester</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 07:05:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Valleywag Gets it Wrong</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-1638808</link><description>So what did they get wrong?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Huggins</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:02:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>