-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Hi Nick, I've been a fan of the All Facebook blog for a few months, but I'm sad to say I'll be removing it from my feed reader. I feel that leading this story with poor attempts at...
- Social Media is going under!
- Scott, I've now seen your full presentation on the Lookery blog. I think the crucial thing you're missing is possibly also absent from Nick's original post about the decline of his Bush...
- Funny - I've been kinda thinking about the opposite - doing more Facebook status and less Twitter.
- Thats shocking
Jump to original thread »
Building a successful Facebook App is tough enough without having to worry about plagiarism and idea theft. Indeed, it is not unreasonable to consider why any sufficiently successful application would not simply be amalgamated by Facebook. A brief exploration of the business mechanics behind Face
... Continue reading »
1 year ago
And that negates everything you argued just now, because how can you know which way Facebook will move in the future?
What if you create an app that works extremely well with advertising and generates a better ROI than anything Facebook offers? FB will NOT allow you to go on too long without competition from them.
1 year ago
Hashim,
You bring up a very interesting and worthwhile point. Let me see if I can clarify.
Facebook's current advertising platform feels like it could be more optimized and to an extent this is likely true. If your application has an incredible revenue stream and/or click through ratio for advertising, the Facebook may take note and adapt their advertising offering from lessons learned. As a whole, however, directly copying any applications or features of applications would create unrest with the entrepreneurial developer community. The money from stealing one good app isn't worth the lost revenue from the five hundred applications that developers won't make because of Facebook's newly-gained "evil" mantra.
This will not and should not stop Facebook from innovating and developing new features, but any new features are more likely to be well expected and known beforehand and will very unlikely undercut successful applications. Facebook does not mind being outdone: there are two "alternative-wall" and three "alternate-poke" programs in the top twenty five as we speak. It has even sacrificed what looked to be an otherwise profitable venture with its Gifts to the various Free Gifts applications.
I cannot tell you what exactly the Facebook game-plan is for the next twelve months. I can tell you it will likely involve an even more advanced platform, as well as an e-wallet payment system. If you intend to build an application that requires money exchange, I would advise using PayPal for now and leaving space to integrate whatever Facebook will offer.
Generally speaking, though, you're OK. The makers of the Fortune Cookie and Zombies may at last have a good night's sleep :)
1 year ago
A way that Facebook can solve this conflict is by offering an adverting platform for developers, and discontinuing their own ad selling. Until then, developers are stuck, and are only acting as incubators for the Facebook mothership.