<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>AllFacebook - Latest Comments in Will Facebook Lose Steam?</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://allfacebook.disqus.com/will_facebook_lose_steam/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:19:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Will Facebook Lose Steam?</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/will-facebook-lose-steam/303563#comment-1637320</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your post is a bit confusing.  You're referring to two kinds of open:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Facebook's flavor of open - allowing people to build within the walled garden. This is what Fred Wilson's complaining about.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Portable Social Networks - This is allowing the user to control their social network information and be able to pull it into whatever application they want.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://microformats.org/wiki/social-network-portability" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://microformats.org/wiki/social-network-portability"&gt;http://microformats.org/wik...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin Thorp</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:19:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Facebook Lose Steam?</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/will-facebook-lose-steam/303563#comment-1637321</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems that closed systems are increasingly not as viable as more open varieties.  Interesting, the Cluetrain Manifesto predicted this model in 2001.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Are there closed models that are working, except in security related markets?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">compassioninpolitics</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 23:25:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>