<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>AllFacebook - Latest Comments in Will Facebook Lose Steam?</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:19:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Will Facebook Lose Steam?</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/08/will-facebook-lose-steam/#comment-1637320</link><description>Your post is a bit confusing.  You're referring to two kinds of open:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Facebook's flavor of open - allowing people to build within the walled garden. This is what Fred Wilson's complaining about.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Portable Social Networks - This is allowing the user to control their social network information and be able to pull it into whatever application they want.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://microformats.org/wiki/social-network-portability" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://microformats.org/wiki/social-network-por...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin Thorp</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:19:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Facebook Lose Steam?</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/08/will-facebook-lose-steam/#comment-1637321</link><description>It seems that closed systems are increasingly not as viable as more open varieties.  Interesting, the Cluetrain Manifesto predicted this model in 2001.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are there closed models that are working, except in security related markets?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">compassioninpolitics</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 23:25:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>